Yet another site to maintain!

TechnologyCategory Archives

The REAL difference between Android and iOS

Proponents for both sides fit into one of two main categories, the intelligent, savvy users and the fanbois (intentional misspelling). The former are users who understand their specific needs and have chosen a platform that suits both their specific style and taste whilst providing a fantastic experience. The latter are the idiots who, like religious extremists, are unable to find a common ground or are even able to constructively understand why they are in their respective camps.

The real differences

When you break it down it really comes back to the following two differences:

  • Hardware specifications
  • Personalisation

All other features such as productivity, SMS, MMS, Social Networking, etc. are available on basically EVERY phone thus are moot from here on in.

Hardware specifications

Most general users of a device really have NO clue as to what is under the hood on their device, and most rightly don’t really care one way or the other, as long as it does what they want and does it quickly. Power users are really the only ones who want to know what’s available. So for the purposes of this discussion, general users are excluded from this particular subject.

Hardware consistency in the iPhone/iPad department has always made developing for iOS a breeze. It really does emulate the philosophy of Java’s “write once, run anywhere” slogan. Android usually get’s the standard fragmentation spiel right about now, and rightly so in that Android doesn’t provide a consistent deployment platform and has to rely upon API’s to handle older hardware (eg. the ActionBar legacy API’s, etc.)

So what you get in one area you lose out in the other. iPhone/iPad hardware has no variation so if you want certain performance in one area then you’re unable to find a device to suit your needs. Gaming for instance is something that requires rather beefy hardware and that’s what you’d expect to get when buying a Galaxy S4. The good old HTC Desire HD would still probably keep you entertained though it has it’s limitations. Whereas from a developers perspective, if you were trying to do something on a mobile platform that was well and truly beyond the available hardware, then you’re either going to have to restrict your target audience or downgrade your app/game to accommodate the lower hardware spec, much like the way web developers have to downgrade their CSS to deal with old browsers.

In the end, hardware CHOICE is what matters most and in the iPhone/iPad side of the fence there really is only the one brand to choose from. So fragmentation == choice, therefore Android would have to win this round.

Personalisation

Android is renown for its plethora of settings and configuration items as well as its ability to use widgets, change home screen layouts and so on. iOS has sorely missed its opportunity to impress users with these features and has taken a whopping 7 versions of iOS to really get behind this idea. Sure, iOS 6 has widgets and notification updates but lets be honest, iOS 7 has truly embraced this concept and has implemented it rather well.

Though personalisation goes beyond widgets, its the ability to have things exactly how you want them. iOS 7 has made headway in this area though still stifles the user by not going that extra mile to make iOS as configurable as Android. Right from the beginning, Android strived to give the user choice and has done so in ever increasing amounts through time.

On the flip side of this is a very simple fact, something that Apple have known about for a long time. Too many options == decision paralysis. By presenting too many options to the user you either scare the user off completely or confuse the user to no end, and ultimately this reduces the users experience with the device. Droves of Android users fled to the iPhone in the early days simply because it didn’t “just work” how the users wanted it to. By the severe restrictions that iOS imposed upon its users, it relieved the users decision paralysis and made the experience a whole lot better.

That said, the real answer to this problem is that options == freedom. Just because you don’t understand what those options do or don’t really care what those options do is irrelevant. NOT being able to change those options on the other hand == imposition and restriction, the opposite of what we want from our devices and thus, Android would also have to win this round.

Conclusion

Ultimately it comes down to user experience over freedom to use the device in the manner in which you want to, so the biggest difference between the two (major) OS’es is that Android gives the user the CHANCE to be free whereas iOS doesn’t. If you feel that you are happy to live in a closed eco-system controlled by a tyrannical company who does nothing but sue anyone who looks at it wrong then Apple is the best choice for you.

Otherwise, sure, it might take you a bit to get up to speed, but just like the slaves in Spartacus, wanting freedom and HAVING freedom are two different things.

iPhone 5 – The hype (or lack thereof) and its reception

Lackluster Reception

Well the iPhone 5 has been released to the world and the amount of flack the phone has copped in the last 24 hours is beyond incredible! The last release was surrounded with so many people desperately trying to get theirs first whereas the iPhone 5′s release paled in comparison.

Apple as a company has
been acting like a bully

Apple as a company has been acting like a bully company of late and the animosity generated from this type of behaviour has more than likely attributed to the lackluster reception.

We expected Android fans to hit the iPhone 5 hard, but after recent events it seems that everyone from every other camp has joined forces and is laying it on exceptionally thick!

Apple bullying the little guy

Just when you thought that Apple couldn’t go any sink any lower we find out that the billion dollar company has decided to come down like a tonne of bricks on an Online Grocery Store in Poland because of their domain name!

The polish grocery store registered a.pl and according to Apple, apparently Apple customers might get confused IF a.pl comes up in a Google search for “Apple”.

that Apple honestly does
not believe that its customers
are smart enough

First I find this incredibly degrading (for Apple customers) in that Apple honestly does not believe that its customers are smart enough to know one search result from another, otherwise, why would they pursue such a lawsuit!

Secondly, what does Apple think will happen when their lawsuit wins (due to the almost unlimited resources Apple has at their disposal as opposed to the “lesser” resources that Delikatesy Internetowe have at their disposal)? How does that effect Apples’ image? Going after anyone and anything?

Lack of Geek Support

Whenever a new tech device comes on the market we expect a certain level of support from the Geek Community, but when you fail to conjure enough Geek support as well as have the general public question your capacity to innovate you’re already spiraling towards the event horizon of the public relations nightmare black hole!

According to this article, “is this really the best we can expect from an outfit that claims to be the most innovative company in the world? This is the sixth version of the iPhone, and the user interface still looks almost exactly like the original iPhone in 2007.

Looking towards the mobile market in general we have, “No wonder the Android platform, where new models appear every week, now represents 68% of the smartphone market, up from 47% a year ago, while Apple slid to 17% over the same period.

chief executive Tim Cook,
whose claim to fame involves
running an efficient supply chain

What’s more is the lack of confidence in Apple’s new leader, “A company that once was run by a product visionary now is run by a number-cruncher – chief executive Tim Cook, whose claim to fame involves running an efficient supply chain and beating ever lower prices out of Asian subcontractors and component suppliers.

Customers Respond to the new iPhone 5

When Jimmy Kimmel played this practical joke on the general public it was a clear indicator that not only is the phone completely indistinguishable from iPhone 4S but more importantly customers wouldn’t notice the difference if they were to purchase one or not as the experience would be more or less identical to the iPhone 4S. Does that warrant forking out for a device that is almost identical to it’s predecessor?

A word from the Apple camp

Though my article thus far has been extremely negative against Apple and the iPhone 5 it’s vital that we consider both sides of the coin and hear from an Apple supporter as to how he feels Apple is still pushing the envelope.

In the following article, “Apple isn’t a company that flails around for new ideas and rushes them to market. It conceives products before the technology exists to make them. Then it refines them for as long as it takes to get them right.

I feel this is just a cop-out
in that he’s claiming that
the only reason there are
only a few improvements
on the iPhone 5 is due to
the fact that it takes so
long to actually make
those improvements

This suggests that Apple have already thought of the next big thing but aren’t rushing it to market because they feel it’s not perfect! Unfortunately I feel this is just a cop-out in that he’s claiming that the only reason there are only a few improvements on the iPhone 5 is due to the fact that it takes so long to actually make those improvements.

He also mentions, “The “upgraded guts” of the iPhone 4S included a CPU chip twice as fast as its predecessor, powered by a battery redesigned to keep it going for the same amount of time per charge, shoehorned into a case that was still the world’s slimmest, since no other smartphone maker had been able to match it.

Again these improvements are hardly revolutionary. Every mobile hardware manufacturer is looking to do the same and will most likely succeed soon. This argument he makes is like saying the iPhone 2 was such a revolutionary step forward, but compared to the iPhone 3G it makes the iPhone 2′s hardware look pathetic. All improvements on hardware will make its predecessors look the same so I hardly think that CPU speed and improved battery design is enough without significant UI upgrades or other features that are different enough.

The article also makes the argument of, “By moving to a larger screen, reckons Lyons, Apple is merely being a “copycat”, since makers of rival devices based on the Android platform have already moved to larger screens. But those makers – including Samsung, the copycat that faces paying Apple $1.05bn (£665m) in patent damages – have given app developers a nightmare by proliferating the number of screen shapes and sizes they have to support.

But this is the same thing Apple has just done, increased the screen size and changed the screen shape, something iOS developers are also going to have to contend with.

I don’t feel that any of this articles points do anything other than compound the problem in that the Apple community in general just can’t see the forest through the trees. I also feel that the comments on his article speak to the man in that they have completely picked the article to pieces (as I expect this one to be :))

Conclusion

The barrage of ridicule, the constant jokes and digs at the device itself, and the hole Apple continues to dig itself by suing anyone or anything that is different will end exactly where it is meant to end, a company who’s products are boring, lack the ability to compete with their most basic competitors and in the end, will replace Microsoft as the “evil” company.

If you are looking to waste a couple hundred bucks on an iPhone 5, my recommendation is to check out ANY Android device before you do. Compare the features and performance of the devices and then decide whether you want to support a company who would sue you just for looking at it wrong or a community supported device that is better in every sense of the word!

Gmail – Too Many Redirects On Login

Gmail will sometimes bail on me with a “Too Many Redirects” HTTP message (actually it’s doing exactly what it’s supposed to under those circumstances) and for the life of me I couldn’t figure out why.

It seems that a dud cookie between accounts.google.com and mail.google.com exists which cause the app to attempt to redirect to each other in order for one of them to figure out what to do but since neither know what’s going on it just loops infinitely until the browser gives up (which it does correctly).

Simply open your cookies and delete anything from .google.com (yeah I know it’ll stuff up any other Google things you might be using but it’s not going to take long before they’re back) and the problem should be resolved!

Solar cells continue to improve

Just when Solar was swept under the carpet yet again, we make another step forward in improving Solar Cell technology.

These smart doods at OSA have found that cells that are better at emitting photons seem to generate more voltage!

Nice!

Are you seriously kidding me?

Google has just set its privacy policy regarding Google Drive, a cloud based storage medium that people can upload their data to and now people are going nuts about privacy issues!

This article explains it a LOT better.

I think the real problem is that PEOPLE should understand that WHEN YOU GIVE SOMEONE YOUR DATA, you are GIVING SOMEONE YOUR DATA!!!!!!

Is it really that much to ask that people understand that putting information ANYWHERE on the internet you LOSE CONTROL of your data. I don’t give a shit how many privacy policies exist, when you give someone your data you pretty much leave it to the integrity of that entity to keep your data safe.

Treat your data like money, would you give your money to a stranger and expect them to have your best interests at heart? Come on!

Linux – are we desktop ready for the ‘normal’ user?

Linux has been a staple OS for me since Red Hat 5.2 (way back in 1998), but even now I speak to people about Linux and there is always hesitation.

I would love to say Linux is ready for the masses but unfortunately it still lacks something. To be frank I can’t even tell you what that is, but when you play with it I still get the feeling that something is missing.

Here’s to the day when Linux is adopted by the world :)

UPDATE: After researching this a little further, I found a blog entry that suggests that my thoughts about Linux are shared by people who influence Linux.

Superhydrophobic glass – The future of perfect glass

With all the attention being placed upon the mobile device market it’s a wonder why inventions like this aren’t happening more often.

Researchers at MIT have developed a glass that is superhydrophobic, anti-glare and self cleaning!

All we need now is for Gorilla and these guys to team up and our mobile devices will be almost indestructible!

Are you giving away your personal information for free?

Apparently 1 in 10 morons who give away an electronic device with a storage medium are not wiping their personal information off of it prior to giving it away.

Check this link for more information on how to securely wipe your devices clean prior to getting rid of them!

See how crap the iPad is!

Honestly, it can’t take a little bit of EM radiation???

Well isn’t this a surprise?!

According to a recent article, your reaction times to external stimuli are reduced when using a smart phone.

Granted this should have been obvious, but the stats show that it’s now actually WORSE than being drunk!

I’d like to see a localised cellular jamming field flooding the cars cabin whilst the car has a velocity of more than 0km/h. This would prevent your phone from receiving data (incoming phone calls, SMS, notifications, etc) whilst your car is in motion.

Even with my bluetooth hands free kit in my car, I still look down to the phone to see who is calling prior to picking up which diverts my eyes, even if it is for a split second, which is long enough to cause any number of incidents!